This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: An evaluation and interpretation of the results is to the _____ section as describing how the study ... (Read 213 times)

charchew

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 579
An evaluation and interpretation of the results is to the _____ section as describing how the study was conducted is to the _____ section.
 
  a. Method; Results
  b. Discussion; Method
  c. Discussion; Abstract
  d. Abstract; Method

Question 2

In the _____ section, the results are evaluated, interpreted, and related to past research and theories.
 
  a. Method
  b. Results
  c. Introduction
  d. Discussion



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

aham8f

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 336
Answer to Question 1

b

Answer to Question 2

d




charchew

  • Member
  • Posts: 579
Reply 2 on: Jun 19, 2018
Great answer, keep it coming :)


Zebsrer

  • Member
  • Posts: 284
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
YES! Correct, THANKS for helping me on my review

 

Did you know?

Bisphosphonates were first developed in the nineteenth century. They were first investigated for use in disorders of bone metabolism in the 1960s. They are now used clinically for the treatment of osteoporosis, Paget's disease, bone metastasis, multiple myeloma, and other conditions that feature bone fragility.

Did you know?

On average, the stomach produces 2 L of hydrochloric acid per day.

Did you know?

Autoimmune diseases occur when the immune system destroys its own healthy tissues. When this occurs, white blood cells cannot distinguish between pathogens and normal cells.

Did you know?

Giardia is one of the most common intestinal parasites worldwide, and infects up to 20% of the world population, mostly in poorer countries with inadequate sanitation. Infections are most common in children, though chronic Giardia is more common in adults.

Did you know?

Dogs have been used in studies to detect various cancers in human subjects. They have been trained to sniff breath samples from humans that were collected by having them breathe into special tubes. These people included 55 lung cancer patients, 31 breast cancer patients, and 83 cancer-free patients. The dogs detected 54 of the 55 lung cancer patients as having cancer, detected 28 of the 31 breast cancer patients, and gave only three false-positive results (detecting cancer in people who didn't have it).

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library