This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: An advantage of holding a variable constant rather than using random assignment to form your groups ... (Read 93 times)

sjones

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 520
An advantage of holding a variable constant rather than using random assignment to form your groups is that holding a variable constant ____.
 
  a. reduces error due to participant differences
  b. is easier than randomization
 c. prevents confounding
 d. ensures a nonbiased sample

Question 2

The Ethics Committee of the APA educates _________ about ethical issues related to psychological research.
 
  a. psychologists
  b. the public
  c. students
  d. all of these



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

cascooper22

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 312
Answer to Question 1

c

Answer to Question 2

D





 

Did you know?

About 100 new prescription or over-the-counter drugs come into the U.S. market every year.

Did you know?

Chronic necrotizing aspergillosis has a slowly progressive process that, unlike invasive aspergillosis, does not spread to other organ systems or the blood vessels. It most often affects middle-aged and elderly individuals, spreading to surrounding tissue in the lungs. The disease often does not respond to conventionally successful treatments, and requires individualized therapies in order to keep it from becoming life-threatening.

Did you know?

Acute bronchitis is an inflammation of the breathing tubes (bronchi), which causes increased mucus production and other changes. It is usually caused by bacteria or viruses, can be serious in people who have pulmonary or cardiac diseases, and can lead to pneumonia.

Did you know?

Approximately one in four people diagnosed with diabetes will develop foot problems. Of these, about one-third will require lower extremity amputation.

Did you know?

Dogs have been used in studies to detect various cancers in human subjects. They have been trained to sniff breath samples from humans that were collected by having them breathe into special tubes. These people included 55 lung cancer patients, 31 breast cancer patients, and 83 cancer-free patients. The dogs detected 54 of the 55 lung cancer patients as having cancer, detected 28 of the 31 breast cancer patients, and gave only three false-positive results (detecting cancer in people who didn't have it).

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library