Author Question: The nature of employer liability changed in the 19th century through judicial instrumentalism and ... (Read 17 times)

joesmith1212

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 549
The nature of employer liability changed in the 19th century through judicial instrumentalism and had what effect?
 
  (a) Reducing the risks and the costs of business, making business enterprise more daring and profitable than it would have been otherwise.
  (b) Increasing the risks and the costs of business, making business enterprise more daring and profitable than it would otherwise have been.
  (c) Continuing the older doctrine that employers could be found guilty of contributory negligence, thus increasing the employer's liability for worker injury.
  (d) None of the above were effects of the changes to the nature of employer liability.

Question 2

The federal funds market is the market for
 
  a. loans from the federal government.
  b. loans from the Federal Reserve.
  c. government borrowing and lending.
  d. interbank lending.
  e. all of the above.



alexisweber49

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 311
Answer to Question 1

(a)

Answer to Question 2

D



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
 

Did you know?

Increased intake of vitamin D has been shown to reduce fractures up to 25% in older people.

Did you know?

To combat osteoporosis, changes in lifestyle and diet are recommended. At-risk patients should include 1,200 to 1,500 mg of calcium daily either via dietary means or with supplements.

Did you know?

The average older adult in the United States takes five prescription drugs per day. Half of these drugs contain a sedative. Alcohol should therefore be avoided by most senior citizens because of the dangerous interactions between alcohol and sedatives.

Did you know?

There are more sensory neurons in the tongue than in any other part of the body.

Did you know?

Dogs have been used in studies to detect various cancers in human subjects. They have been trained to sniff breath samples from humans that were collected by having them breathe into special tubes. These people included 55 lung cancer patients, 31 breast cancer patients, and 83 cancer-free patients. The dogs detected 54 of the 55 lung cancer patients as having cancer, detected 28 of the 31 breast cancer patients, and gave only three false-positive results (detecting cancer in people who didn't have it).

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library