This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: In the case of Commonwealth v. Hunt (1842), the Massachusetts Court held that labor unions are not ... (Read 122 times)

imanialler

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 539
In the case of Commonwealth v. Hunt (1842), the Massachusetts Court held that labor unions are not necessarily illegal. They may stop work and boycott products without committing unlawful acts.
 
  Indicate whether the statement is true or false

Question 2

Which of the following are expected consequences of common ownership of property and resources?
 
  (a) The threat of corrupt use
  (b) The danger of over use
  (c) Free riding
  (d) All of the above



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

TheDev123

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 332
Answer to Question 1

True

Answer to Question 2

(d)




imanialler

  • Member
  • Posts: 539
Reply 2 on: Jun 30, 2018
:D TYSM


deja

  • Member
  • Posts: 332
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Great answer, keep it coming :)

 

Did you know?

The average person is easily confused by the terms pharmaceutics and pharmacology, thinking they are one and the same. Whereas pharmaceutics is the science of preparing and dispensing drugs (otherwise known as the science of pharmacy), pharmacology is the study of medications.

Did you know?

Automated pill dispensing systems have alarms to alert patients when the correct dosing time has arrived. Most systems work with many varieties of medications, so patients who are taking a variety of drugs can still be in control of their dose regimen.

Did you know?

Vaccines prevent between 2.5 and 4 million deaths every year.

Did you know?

Malaria mortality rates are falling. Increased malaria prevention and control measures have greatly improved these rates. Since 2000, malaria mortality rates have fallen globally by 60% among all age groups, and by 65% among children under age 5.

Did you know?

Although the Roman numeral for the number 4 has always been taught to have been "IV," according to historians, the ancient Romans probably used "IIII" most of the time. This is partially backed up by the fact that early grandfather clocks displayed IIII for the number 4 instead of IV. Early clockmakers apparently thought that the IIII balanced out the VIII (used for the number 8) on the clock face and that it just looked better.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library