This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: Explain with examples the reasoning behind the positive slope of the LRAC curve at higher levels of ... (Read 27 times)

abc

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 543
Explain with examples the reasoning behind the positive slope of the LRAC curve at higher levels of output.

Question 2

Suppose a firm in a perfectly competitive market is operating at its profit-maximizing level of output. Will the firm suspend operations if it faces a reduction in the price it can charge for its product?
 a. No, because it can always raise its prices in the short run.
  b. No, because it can always raise its prices in the long run.
  c. No, as long as the firm earns sufficient revenue to pay all of the variable costs.
  d. Yes, since it never makes sense to operate at a loss, even in the short run.
  e. No, because it always makes sense to operate at a loss, even in the long run.



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

ashely1112

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 347
Answer to Question 1

According to economist Alfred Marshall, LRAC curves reach a minimum and then turn upward because larger firms place such demands on management that even the most talented executives eventually lose their ability to control costs. Marshall reasoned that a single manager or a small group of them would ultimately be unable to monitor the performance of a large workforce or to efficiently coordinate the many different activities that take place in a large firm. Marshall thought that even managers who delegate some decisions to subordinates would have problems communicating with them and motivating them to make decisions that benefit the firm's owners.

For example, very few top-tier gourmet restaurants, for instance, operate in more than one or two venues. Their success or failure depends on constantly monitoring the quality of ingredients and operations in the kitchen, and authority over details like these is difficult to put into the hands of more than one person. In practice, a financier often bankrolls a chef and gives the chef final authority over all food-related decisions. By contrast, fast-food outlets are better viewed as factories than as restaurants. Franchising puts decisions about purchasing, advertising, and menu items in the hands of a parent company, leaving local operators the job of assembling these ingredients in standardized ways and keeping their stores clean. The fact that New York City contains hundreds of McDonald's while renowned chef Daniel Boulud has only a single outlet reflects the difficulties of managing the latter. On the other hand, prestige steak houses, like Morton's and Ruth's Chris, operate nationally and are mostly franchises. Their simple recipes facilitate quality control and their standardized menus allow the parent companies to buy ingredients of uniform quality for all of their outlets.

Answer to Question 2

c




abc

  • Member
  • Posts: 543
Reply 2 on: Jun 30, 2018
Thanks for the timely response, appreciate it


CAPTAINAMERICA

  • Member
  • Posts: 325
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Great answer, keep it coming :)

 

Did you know?

This year, an estimated 1.4 million Americans will have a new or recurrent heart attack.

Did you know?

Asthma occurs in one in 11 children and in one in 12 adults. African Americans and Latinos have a higher risk for developing asthma than other groups.

Did you know?

Though methadone is often used to treat dependency on other opioids, the drug itself can be abused. Crushing or snorting methadone can achieve the opiate "rush" desired by addicts. Improper use such as these can lead to a dangerous dependency on methadone. This drug now accounts for nearly one-third of opioid-related deaths.

Did you know?

In ancient Rome, many of the richer people in the population had lead-induced gout. The reason for this is unclear. Lead poisoning has also been linked to madness.

Did you know?

The tallest man ever known was Robert Wadlow, an American, who reached the height of 8 feet 11 inches. He died at age 26 years from an infection caused by the immense weight of his body (491 pounds) and the stress on his leg bones and muscles.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library