This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: Why is the principal-agent problem less likely when getting a haircut than when getting a car ... (Read 56 times)

charchew

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 579
Why is the principal-agent problem less likely when getting a haircut than when getting a car repaired?
 a. Haircuts are less expensive than car repairs.
  b. There are no hidden actions when getting your hair cut.
  c. There are no hidden actions when getting your car repaired.
  d. Auto mechanics are less honest than hair stylists.
  e. There is no principal-agent relationship in car repair.

Question 2

Throughout the world, poverty is greater among women than men, particularly women who head households.
 a. True
  b. False



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

reelove4eva

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 332
Answer to Question 1

B

Answer to Question 2

A




charchew

  • Member
  • Posts: 579
Reply 2 on: Jun 30, 2018
:D TYSM


bassamabas

  • Member
  • Posts: 294
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Gracias!

 

Did you know?

In ancient Rome, many of the richer people in the population had lead-induced gout. The reason for this is unclear. Lead poisoning has also been linked to madness.

Did you know?

Atropine, along with scopolamine and hyoscyamine, is found in the Datura stramonium plant, which gives hallucinogenic effects and is also known as locoweed.

Did you know?

Adult head lice are gray, about ? inch long, and often have a tiny dot on their backs. A female can lay between 50 and 150 eggs within the several weeks that she is alive. They feed on human blood.

Did you know?

Since 1988, the CDC has reported a 99% reduction in bacterial meningitis caused by Haemophilus influenzae, due to the introduction of the vaccine against it.

Did you know?

Dogs have been used in studies to detect various cancers in human subjects. They have been trained to sniff breath samples from humans that were collected by having them breathe into special tubes. These people included 55 lung cancer patients, 31 breast cancer patients, and 83 cancer-free patients. The dogs detected 54 of the 55 lung cancer patients as having cancer, detected 28 of the 31 breast cancer patients, and gave only three false-positive results (detecting cancer in people who didn't have it).

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library