This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: The difference between Likert scales and category formats is that a. category formats are used ... (Read 203 times)

stock

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 573
The difference between Likert scales and category formats is that
 
  a. category formats are used only in health settings.
  b. category formats tends to be dichotomous while Likert scales tends to be polytomous.
  c. category formats tend to have a smaller number of choices.
  d. Likert scales tend to have a smaller number of choices.

Question 2

A test that yields dependable and consistent results is ____.
 
  a. meaningful
  b. objective
 c. reliable
 d. valid



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

chloejackso

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 316
Answer to Question 1

d

Answer to Question 2

c




stock

  • Member
  • Posts: 573
Reply 2 on: Jun 19, 2018
:D TYSM


dantucker

  • Member
  • Posts: 346
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
YES! Correct, THANKS for helping me on my review

 

Did you know?

When intravenous medications are involved in adverse drug events, their harmful effects may occur more rapidly, and be more severe than errors with oral medications. This is due to the direct administration into the bloodstream.

Did you know?

Elderly adults are at greatest risk of stroke and myocardial infarction and have the most to gain from prophylaxis. Patients ages 60 to 80 years with blood pressures above 160/90 mm Hg should benefit from antihypertensive treatment.

Did you know?

Sperm cells are so tiny that 400 to 500 million (400,000,000–500,000,000) of them fit onto 1 tsp.

Did you know?

Human neurons are so small that they require a microscope in order to be seen. However, some neurons can be up to 3 feet long, such as those that extend from the spinal cord to the toes.

Did you know?

Dogs have been used in studies to detect various cancers in human subjects. They have been trained to sniff breath samples from humans that were collected by having them breathe into special tubes. These people included 55 lung cancer patients, 31 breast cancer patients, and 83 cancer-free patients. The dogs detected 54 of the 55 lung cancer patients as having cancer, detected 28 of the 31 breast cancer patients, and gave only three false-positive results (detecting cancer in people who didn't have it).

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library