This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: The purchasing power parity predicts that if US price level falls relative to the Mexico price ... (Read 129 times)

Pineappleeh

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 585
The purchasing power parity predicts that if US price level falls relative to the Mexico price level, then
 a. Dollar value will rise relative to the peso
  b. Dollar value will fall relative to the peso
  c. There is no effect on either currency
  d. PPP predicts price level will normalize in the long-run

Question 2

The existence of diseconomies of scale (size) for the firm is hypothesized to result from:
 a. transportation costs
  b. imperfections in the labor market
  c. imperfections in the capital markets
  d. problems of coordination and control encountered by management
  e. All of the above



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

kswal303

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 316
Answer to Question 1

a

Answer to Question 2

d




Pineappleeh

  • Member
  • Posts: 585
Reply 2 on: Jul 1, 2018
Gracias!


Viet Thy

  • Member
  • Posts: 329
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Thanks for the timely response, appreciate it

 

Did you know?

The longest a person has survived after a heart transplant is 24 years.

Did you know?

Only 12 hours after an egg cell is fertilized by a sperm cell, the egg cell starts to divide. As it continues to divide, it moves along the fallopian tube toward the uterus at about 1 inch per day.

Did you know?

The first successful kidney transplant was performed in 1954 and occurred in Boston. A kidney from an identical twin was transplanted into his dying brother's body and was not rejected because it did not appear foreign to his body.

Did you know?

Most fungi that pathogenically affect humans live in soil. If a person is not healthy, has an open wound, or is immunocompromised, a fungal infection can be very aggressive.

Did you know?

Although the Roman numeral for the number 4 has always been taught to have been "IV," according to historians, the ancient Romans probably used "IIII" most of the time. This is partially backed up by the fact that early grandfather clocks displayed IIII for the number 4 instead of IV. Early clockmakers apparently thought that the IIII balanced out the VIII (used for the number 8) on the clock face and that it just looked better.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library