This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: The explosive growth in population after 1650 can be directly attributed to: a. decreases in the ... (Read 22 times)

bcretired

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 525
The explosive growth in population after 1650 can be directly attributed to:
 
  a. decreases in the incidence of war
  b. decreases in the incidence of large-scale disease
  c. improved prenatal and postnatal care
  d. the impact of the Industrial Revolution beginning in the 18th century

Question 2

Approximately how many people living in the U.S. today are over 100 years of age?
 
  a. 500
  b. 8,000
  c. 15,000
  d. 28,000



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

coyin

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 334
Answer to Question 1

D

Answer to Question 2

D




bcretired

  • Member
  • Posts: 525
Reply 2 on: Jul 1, 2018
Excellent


kusterl

  • Member
  • Posts: 315
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Wow, this really help

 

Did you know?

Vaccines prevent between 2.5 and 4 million deaths every year.

Did you know?

Over time, chronic hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus infections can progress to advanced liver disease, liver failure, and hepatocellular carcinoma. Unlike other forms, more than 80% of hepatitis C infections become chronic and lead to liver disease. When combined with hepatitis B, hepatitis C now accounts for 75% percent of all cases of liver disease around the world. Liver failure caused by hepatitis C is now leading cause of liver transplants in the United States.

Did you know?

There are immediate benefits of chiropractic adjustments that are visible via magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). It shows that spinal manipulation therapy is effective in decreasing pain and increasing the gaps between the vertebrae, reducing pressure that leads to pain.

Did you know?

People about to have surgery must tell their health care providers about all supplements they take.

Did you know?

Although the Roman numeral for the number 4 has always been taught to have been "IV," according to historians, the ancient Romans probably used "IIII" most of the time. This is partially backed up by the fact that early grandfather clocks displayed IIII for the number 4 instead of IV. Early clockmakers apparently thought that the IIII balanced out the VIII (used for the number 8) on the clock face and that it just looked better.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library