This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: What do you learn from this case that would help you advise Microsoft in its anticompetitive case ... (Read 33 times)

ahriuashd

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 535
What do you learn from this case that would help you advise Microsoft in its anticompetitive case with the federal government,
 
  or advise Barnes & Noble.com to displace Amazon.com, or advise American Greetings to become the dominant player in the greeting card business? What practical hints, in other words, do you derive from this classic case of analytical problem solving gone awry?
 
  What will be an ideal response?

Question 2

Outline the problem-solving steps followed by Kimmel and his advisors. What steps in analytical problem solving were skipped or short-circuited?
 
  What will be an ideal response?



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

joanwhite

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 308
Answer to Question 1

Answer: This case shows the rigidity that develops as a result of violating several principles of creative problem solving. A class discussion uses the questions at the end of the case as a focus. The following are brief answers to the questions.

At least the following five conceptual blocks are present:
 Vertical thinking (not considering other alternatives to past strategies
 Artificially constraining problems (The Japanese . . . would not launch an attack against any American possession.)
 Past experiences causing stereotyping (Kimmel continually received assurances from the members of his in-group that confirmed past decisions)
 Lack of inquisitiveness (Kimmel failed to inquire about several messages he received)
 Not separating figure from ground (He and his advisors devoted considerable attention to the exact wording of the memo.

Kimmel clearly used a participative decision style, but he also generated limited alternatives and selected the easiest satisfactory solution. His inclination was to logically analyze memos in detail, but to maintain the status quo.

Almost any of the principles listed in the text could aid information gathering and alternative generation.

Often managers in organizations surround themselves with at least some individuals who take a confrontational, challenging role. This helps guard against groupthink, stimulates information gathering from a wider variety of sources, and avoids the tendency to make overly restrictive assumptions. Another structure Kimmel could have used was a formal information gathering and checking unit. When unclear memos were received, that unit would obtain additional information.

Answer to Question 2

Answer: This case shows the rigidity that develops as a result of violating several principles of creative problem solving. A class discussion uses the questions at the end of the case as a focus. The following are brief answers to the questions.

At least the following five conceptual blocks are present:
 Vertical thinking (not considering other alternatives to past strategies
 Artificially constraining problems (The Japanese . . . would not launch an attack against any American possession.)
 Past experiences causing stereotyping (Kimmel continually received assurances from the members of his in-group that confirmed past decisions)
 Lack of inquisitiveness (Kimmel failed to inquire about several messages he received)
 Not separating figure from ground (He and his advisors devoted considerable attention to the exact wording of the memo.

Kimmel clearly used a participative decision style, but he also generated limited alternatives and selected the easiest satisfactory solution. His inclination was to logically analyze memos in detail, but to maintain the status quo.

Almost any of the principles listed in the text could aid information gathering and alternative generation.

Often managers in organizations surround themselves with at least some individuals who take a confrontational, challenging role. This helps guard against groupthink, stimulates information gathering from a wider variety of sources, and avoids the tendency to make overly restrictive assumptions. Another structure Kimmel could have used was a formal information gathering and checking unit. When unclear memos were received, that unit would obtain additional information.




ahriuashd

  • Member
  • Posts: 535
Reply 2 on: Jul 6, 2018
:D TYSM


bassamabas

  • Member
  • Posts: 294
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Excellent

 

Did you know?

In 1844, Charles Goodyear obtained the first patent for a rubber condom.

Did you know?

The senior population grows every year. Seniors older than 65 years of age now comprise more than 13% of the total population. However, women outlive men. In the 85-and-over age group, there are only 45 men to every 100 women.

Did you know?

In inpatient settings, adverse drug events account for an estimated one in three of all hospital adverse events. They affect approximately 2 million hospital stays every year, and prolong hospital stays by between one and five days.

Did you know?

The term bacteria was devised in the 19th century by German biologist Ferdinand Cohn. He based it on the Greek word "bakterion" meaning a small rod or staff. Cohn is considered to be the father of modern bacteriology.

Did you know?

The types of cancer that alpha interferons are used to treat include hairy cell leukemia, melanoma, follicular non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, and AIDS-related Kaposi's sarcoma.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library