Answer to Question 1
Answer: C
Answer to Question 2
Answer: Some of the structural areas where we see differences in managing global teams include conformity, status, social loafing, and cohesiveness. Research suggests that Asch's findings are culture-bound. Despite this, however, groupthink tends to be less of a problem in global teams because members are less likely to feel pressured to conform to the ideas, conclusions, and decisions of the group. The importance of status varies between cultures. Managers should be sure to understand who and what holds status when interacting with people from a culture different from their own. Social loafing has a Western bias and is consistent with individualistic cultures, which are dominated by self-interest. It's not consistent with collectivistic societies, in which individuals are motivated by in-group goals. Cohesiveness is another group structural element where managers may face special challenges. In global teams, cohesiveness is often more difficult to achieve because of higher levels of mistrust, miscommunication, and stress.
The tundra at the base of the Torngat mountains in Labrador consists primarily of low-growing mosses
![People have seen patterns in the stars since ancient times.[5] This 1690 depiction of the constellat](https://biology-forums.com/gallery/47/medium_12359_26_01_13_3_44_40.png)
People have seen patterns in the stars since ancient times.[5] This 1690 depiction of the constellat
Environmental Systems in Space and Time
Landscape ecologists study broad geographical patterns
Nutrients Are Transported through the Circulatory and Lymphatic Systems Water-soluble nutrients
Accounting Information Systems, 4th Edition