Author Question: Which is not a legitimate method of cutting arbitration costs? a. using local arbitrators b. ... (Read 56 times)

lak

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 546
Which is not a legitimate method of cutting arbitration costs?
 
  a. using local arbitrators
  b. dispensing with written opinions
  c. using the courts before attempting arbitration
  d. eliminating grievances of minimal importance

Question 2

Perhaps the chief disadvantage of the ad hoc method of selecting arbitrators is
 
  a. consistency is not assured.
  b. parties can be stuck with an arbitrator they do not want.
  c. such arbitrators are more expensive.
  d. there is a tendency to bring more cases to arbitration.



jaykayy05

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 329
Answer to Question 1

C

Answer to Question 2

A



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
 

Did you know?

People with high total cholesterol have about two times the risk for heart disease as people with ideal levels.

Did you know?

The Babylonians wrote numbers in a system that used 60 as the base value rather than the number 10. They did not have a symbol for "zero."

Did you know?

Medication errors are more common among seriously ill patients than with those with minor conditions.

Did you know?

To prove that stomach ulcers were caused by bacteria and not by stress, a researcher consumed an entire laboratory beaker full of bacterial culture. After this, he did indeed develop stomach ulcers, and won the Nobel Prize for his discovery.

Did you know?

Most fungi that pathogenically affect humans live in soil. If a person is not healthy, has an open wound, or is immunocompromised, a fungal infection can be very aggressive.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library