This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: Without _____, it is very difficult to evaluate training. A) Personnel objectives B) Performance ... (Read 79 times)

MGLQZ

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 579
Without _____, it is very difficult to evaluate training.
 
  A) Personnel objectives
  B) Performance appraisals
  C) Organizational outcomes
  D) Learning objectives

Question 2

When the number of employees being trained is small, Blanchard & Thacker recommend which of the following evaluation designs?
 
  A) Do not evaluate; it is not cost effective
  B) Posttest only
  C) Single case designs
  D) Multiple case designs



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

juwms

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 337
Answer to Question 1

D

Answer to Question 2

C




MGLQZ

  • Member
  • Posts: 579
Reply 2 on: Jul 7, 2018
:D TYSM


bigsis44

  • Member
  • Posts: 317
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Great answer, keep it coming :)

 

Did you know?

There are more nerve cells in one human brain than there are stars in the Milky Way.

Did you know?

The average person is easily confused by the terms pharmaceutics and pharmacology, thinking they are one and the same. Whereas pharmaceutics is the science of preparing and dispensing drugs (otherwise known as the science of pharmacy), pharmacology is the study of medications.

Did you know?

In most climates, 8 to 10 glasses of water per day is recommended for adults. The best indicator for adequate fluid intake is frequent, clear urination.

Did you know?

About 80% of major fungal systemic infections are due to Candida albicans. Another form, Candida peritonitis, occurs most often in postoperative patients. A rare disease, Candida meningitis, may follow leukemia, kidney transplant, other immunosuppressed factors, or when suffering from Candida septicemia.

Did you know?

When Gabriel Fahrenheit invented the first mercury thermometer, he called "zero degrees" the lowest temperature he was able to attain with a mixture of ice and salt. For the upper point of his scale, he used 96°, which he measured as normal human body temperature (we know it to be 98.6° today because of more accurate thermometers).

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library