[Answered] In 2022, how old will Cary have to be to receive full Social Security benefits? A) 57 B) 62 C) ...

This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: In 2022, how old will Cary have to be to receive full Social Security benefits? A) 57 B) 62 C) ... (Read 156 times)

michelleunicorn

Hero Member
Posts: 565

on: Jul 7, 2018

In 2022, how old will Cary have to be to receive full Social Security benefits?

A) 57
B) 62
C) 65
D) 67

Question 2

To be fully insured under the OASDI retirement benefit, an employee would have to work at least how long?

A) 24 months
B) 5 years
C) 10 years
D) 30 years

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question

Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

beccamahon

Sr. Member
Posts: 338

Reply #1 on: Jul 7, 2018

Answer to Question 1

Answer: D

Answer to Question 2

Answer: C

michelleunicorn

Member
Posts: 565

Reply 2 on: Jul 7, 2018

YES! Correct, THANKS for helping me on my review

ttt030911

Member
Posts: 315

Reply 3 on: Yesterday

Wow, this really help

« previous next »

Did you know?

The Romans did not use numerals to indicate fractions but instead used words to indicate parts of a whole.

Did you know?

The modern decimal position system was the invention of the Hindus (around 800 AD), involving the placing of numerals to indicate their value (units, tens, hundreds, and so on).

Did you know?

About 600,000 particles of skin are shed every hour by each human. If you live to age 70 years, you have shed 105 pounds of dead skin.

Did you know?

According to animal studies, the typical American diet is damaging to the liver and may result in allergies, low energy, digestive problems, and a lack of ability to detoxify harmful substances.

Did you know?

Although the Roman numeral for the number 4 has always been taught to have been "IV," according to historians, the ancient Romans probably used "IIII" most of the time. This is partially backed up by the fact that early grandfather clocks displayed IIII for the number 4 instead of IV. Early clockmakers apparently thought that the IIII balanced out the VIII (used for the number 8) on the clock face and that it just looked better.