Author Question: When redesigning a database, how can we check assumptions about functional dependencies? What ... (Read 55 times)

kshipps

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 571
When redesigning a database, how can we check assumptions about functional dependencies?
 
  What will be an ideal response?

Question 2

SQL query results are displayed:
 
  A) in a tabbed results window.
  B) in a tabbed Results1 window.
  C) in a tabbed Document window.
  D) in a tabbed Messages window.
  E) in a tabbed Finished window.



billybob123

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 336
Answer to Question 1

There are two related SQL techniques that we can use to check assumptions about functional dependencies in an existing database. The first is to use a correlated subquery with the SQL IN keyword, and the second is to use a correlated subquery structure using the SQL EXISTS and/or NOT EXISTS keywords.

Answer to Question 2

A



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
 

Did you know?

The use of salicylates dates back 2,500 years to Hippocrates's recommendation of willow bark (from which a salicylate is derived) as an aid to the pains of childbirth. However, overdosage of salicylates can harm body fluids, electrolytes, the CNS, the GI tract, the ears, the lungs, the blood, the liver, and the kidneys and cause coma or death.

Did you know?

The lipid bilayer is made of phospholipids. They are arranged in a double layer because one of their ends is attracted to water while the other is repelled by water.

Did you know?

About 600,000 particles of skin are shed every hour by each human. If you live to age 70 years, you have shed 105 pounds of dead skin.

Did you know?

Many supplement containers do not even contain what their labels say. There are many documented reports of products containing much less, or more, that what is listed on their labels. They may also contain undisclosed prescription drugs and even contaminants.

Did you know?

Although the Roman numeral for the number 4 has always been taught to have been "IV," according to historians, the ancient Romans probably used "IIII" most of the time. This is partially backed up by the fact that early grandfather clocks displayed IIII for the number 4 instead of IV. Early clockmakers apparently thought that the IIII balanced out the VIII (used for the number 8) on the clock face and that it just looked better.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library