This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: What is the functional equivalence hypothesis and how does it apply to mental images? Describe how ... (Read 65 times)

acc299

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 569
What is the functional equivalence hypothesis and how does it apply to mental images? Describe how imaging studies support the idea of functional equivalence.
 
  What will be an ideal response?

Question 2

Using an example, explain what a proposition is.
 
  What will be an ideal response?



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

carojassy25

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 299
Answer to Question 1

According to the functional equivalence hypothesis, although visual imagery is not identical to visual perception, it is functionally equivalent to it. Functionally equivalent things are strongly analogous to each otherthey can accomplish the same goals. The functionally equivalent images are thus analogous to the physical percepts they represent. This view essentially suggests that we use images rather than propositions in knowledge representation for concrete objects that can be pictured in the mind.

Evidence for functional equivalence can be found in neuroimaging studies. In one study, for example, participants either viewed or imagined an image. Activation of similar brain areas was noted, in particular, in the frontal and parietal regions. Additionally, imagery can evoke responses in high-level visual brain areas and the visual primary cortexareas that are highly involved in the processing of visual stimuli we see with our eyes.

Answer to Question 2

To describe a picture in which a cat is sitting underneath a table, you could say, The table is above the cat.. You also could say, The cat is beneath the table.. Both of these statements indicate the same relationship as above the cat is the table.. With a little extra work, you probably could come up with a dozen or more ways of verbally representing this relationship. Logicians have devised a shorthand means, called predicate calculus, to express the underlying meaning of a relationship. This method attempts to strip away the various superficial differences in the ways we describe the deeper meaning of a proposition: Relationship between elements(Subject element, Object element)




acc299

  • Member
  • Posts: 569
Reply 2 on: Jun 20, 2018
Excellent


amandanbreshears

  • Member
  • Posts: 320
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
:D TYSM

 

Did you know?

A good example of polar molecules can be understood when trying to make a cake. If water and oil are required, they will not mix together. If you put them into a measuring cup, the oil will rise to the top while the water remains on the bottom.

Did you know?

The Babylonians wrote numbers in a system that used 60 as the base value rather than the number 10. They did not have a symbol for "zero."

Did you know?

Malaria was not eliminated in the United States until 1951. The term eliminated means that no new cases arise in a country for 3 years.

Did you know?

On average, someone in the United States has a stroke about every 40 seconds. This is about 795,000 people per year.

Did you know?

Eating carrots will improve your eyesight. Carrots are high in vitamin A (retinol), which is essential for good vision. It can also be found in milk, cheese, egg yolks, and liver.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library