[Answered] A published literature review article would be considered a primary source for a person doing a ...

This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: A published literature review article would be considered a primary source for a person doing a ... (Read 108 times)

sheilaspns

Hero Member
Posts: 567

on: Jul 8, 2018

A published literature review article would be considered a primary source for a person doing a literature review on the same topic.

A) True
B) False

Question 2

Quantitative researchers tend not to use data collection methods that are objective.

A) True
B) False

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question

Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

pocatato

Sr. Member
Posts: 333

Reply #1 on: Jul 8, 2018

Answer to Question 1

B

Answer to Question 2

B

sheilaspns

Member
Posts: 567

Reply 2 on: Jul 8, 2018

Excellent

fatboyy09

Member
Posts: 358

Reply 3 on: Yesterday

YES! Correct, THANKS for helping me on my review

« previous next »

Did you know?

Autoimmune diseases occur when the immune system destroys its own healthy tissues. When this occurs, white blood cells cannot distinguish between pathogens and normal cells.

Did you know?

Colchicine is a highly poisonous alkaloid originally extracted from a type of saffron plant that is used mainly to treat gout.

Did you know?

For high blood pressure (hypertension), a new class of drug, called a vasopeptidase blocker (inhibitor), has been developed. It decreases blood pressure by simultaneously dilating the peripheral arteries and increasing the body's loss of salt.

Did you know?

Most childhood vaccines are 90–99% effective in preventing disease. Side effects are rarely serious.

Did you know?

Disorders that may affect pharmacodynamics include genetic mutations, malnutrition, thyrotoxicosis, myasthenia gravis, Parkinson's disease, and certain forms of insulin-resistant diabetes mellitus.