Author Question: Thirty patients with psoriasis are treated with ultraviolet light B phototherapy, delivered by a ... (Read 69 times)

BrownTown3

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 564
Thirty patients with psoriasis are treated with ultraviolet light B phototherapy, delivered by a therapist. Their symptoms become worse at first, and then improve.
 
  During the summer their symptoms become better without treatment. Then fall arrives, and symptoms worsen. Patients go back to UVL B, and they improve. Why, according to Hume, can the relationship between UVL B phototherapy and symptom severity not be considered a classically causal one?
  a. Ultraviolet light B phototherapy wasn't invented during Hume's lifetime.
  b. There must be a strong relationship between the proposed cause and the effect.
  c. The cause (phototherapy) has to be present whenever the effect occurs.
  d. The cause must precede the effect in time.

Question 2

Why is selection of an appropriate design for a research study important?
 
  a. If the design is an incorrect one, the researcher will examine variables and their interactions in a way that does not answer the research question.
  b. The design provides a blueprint or diagram that appears in the concept map.
  c. If there is no design, critique is impossible.
  d. If the design is appropriate, the researcher can eliminate error.



Ddddd

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 334
Answer to Question 1

ANS: C
Some of the ideas related to causation emerged from the logical positivist philosophical tradition. Hume, a positivist, proposed that the following three conditions must be met to establish causality: (1) there must be a strong relationship between the proposed cause and the effect, (2) the proposed cause must precede the effect in time, and (3) the cause has to be present whenever the effect occurs. Cause, according to Hume, is not directly observable but must be inferred.

Answer to Question 2

ANS: A
A research design is the blueprint for conducting a study. It maximizes control over factors that could interfere with the validity of the study findings. Being able to identify the study design and to evaluate design flaws that might threaten the validity of findings is an important part of critically appraising studies. When conducting a study, the research design guides the researcher in planning and implementing a study in a way to achieve accurate results. The control achieved through the quantitative study design increases the probability that the study findings are an accurate reflection of reality.



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
 

Did you know?

For about 100 years, scientists thought that peptic ulcers were caused by stress, spicy food, and alcohol. Later, researchers added stomach acid to the list of causes and began treating ulcers with antacids. Now it is known that peptic ulcers are predominantly caused by Helicobacter pylori, a spiral-shaped bacterium that normally exist in the stomach.

Did you know?

About 100 new prescription or over-the-counter drugs come into the U.S. market every year.

Did you know?

After 5 years of being diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis, one every three patients will no longer be able to work.

Did you know?

More than 34,000 trademarked medication names and more than 10,000 generic medication names are in use in the United States.

Did you know?

Every 10 seconds, a person in the United States goes to the emergency room complaining of head pain. About 1.2 million visits are for acute migraine attacks.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library