This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: Which source of information is rarely cited in academic publications? a. Conference proceedings ... (Read 79 times)

lidoalex

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 538
Which source of information is rarely cited in academic publications?
 
  a. Conference proceedings
  b. Dissertation or thesis
  c. Encyclopedia
  d. Textbooks

Question 2

When determining the reliability of a website resource in a literature review, it is important to determine
 
  a. accessibility of the website information.
  b. costs of retrieving website information.
  c. sponsorship of website information.
  d. whether website information is also published conventionally.



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

shewald78

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 340
Answer to Question 1

ANS: C

Answer to Question 2

ANS: C




lidoalex

  • Member
  • Posts: 538
Reply 2 on: Jul 8, 2018
Excellent


shailee

  • Member
  • Posts: 392
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Great answer, keep it coming :)

 

Did you know?

A strange skin disease referred to as Morgellons has occurred in the southern United States and in California. Symptoms include slowly healing sores, joint pain, persistent fatigue, and a sensation of things crawling through the skin. Another symptom is strange-looking, threadlike extrusions coming out of the skin.

Did you know?

In the United States, an estimated 50 million unnecessary antibiotics are prescribed for viral respiratory infections.

Did you know?

HIV testing reach is still limited. An estimated 40% of people with HIV (more than 14 million) remain undiagnosed and do not know their infection status.

Did you know?

Alzheimer's disease affects only about 10% of people older than 65 years of age. Most forms of decreased mental function and dementia are caused by disuse (letting the mind get lazy).

Did you know?

Dogs have been used in studies to detect various cancers in human subjects. They have been trained to sniff breath samples from humans that were collected by having them breathe into special tubes. These people included 55 lung cancer patients, 31 breast cancer patients, and 83 cancer-free patients. The dogs detected 54 of the 55 lung cancer patients as having cancer, detected 28 of the 31 breast cancer patients, and gave only three false-positive results (detecting cancer in people who didn't have it).

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library