Which of these is considered a reason that opposes an expansion ...

[Anajune7]

Which of these is considered a reason that opposes an expansion of the governor's powers?
 
  a. The governor already has a lot of personal power based on the margin of electoral victory and personal persuasion, so additional power is not necessary.
  b. Because there is often no clear executive authority from the governor, bureaucrats have too much discretion to act on their own.
  c. The governor needs to be able to control all boards and commissions soon after his or her election to implement more favorable policies.
  d. The legislature's power is too strong, and a stronger governor would help counteract that.
 e. There are too many elected officials in Texas, creating confusion among the public.

Question 2

Which of these is considered a reason that supports an expansion of the governor's powers?
 
  a. The governor would have more meaningful budget authority.
 b. The governor's veto power is not as absolute as it should be.
 c. Dispersion of power is a good way to keep one person from gaining too much control.
  d. The governor would be able to appoint more people to serve on the state executive board.
  e. The personal power of the governor is not strong enough.

[akpaschal]

Answer to Question 1

a

Answer to Question 2

a

[Anajune7]

TYSM

[kusterl]

Gracias!