Author Question: Why is economic growth not a good indicator of how well a nation performs? a. Economic growth ... (Read 166 times)

aabwk4

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 593
Why is economic growth not a good indicator of how well
 
  a nation performs?
  a. Economic growth standards differ from one country to the next.
  b. Economic growth varies too much.
  c. Economic growth has a disproportional impact on all citizens.
  d. Economic growth has a proportional impact on all citizens.

Question 2

Party discipline is greatest with:
 
  a. proportional representation.
  b. plurality voting systems.
  c. competitive party systems.
  d. fragmented party systems.



cassie_ragen

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 347
Answer to Question 1

Answer: c

Answer to Question 2

Answer: a



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
 

Did you know?

As many as 28% of hospitalized patients requiring mechanical ventilators to help them breathe (for more than 48 hours) will develop ventilator-associated pneumonia. Current therapy involves intravenous antibiotics, but new antibiotics that can be inhaled (and more directly treat the infection) are being developed.

Did you know?

More than 50% of American adults have oral herpes, which is commonly known as "cold sores" or "fever blisters." The herpes virus can be active on the skin surface without showing any signs or causing any symptoms.

Did you know?

The highest suicide rate in the United States is among people ages 65 years and older. Almost 15% of people in this age group commit suicide every year.

Did you know?

Pink eye is a term that refers to conjunctivitis, which is inflammation of the thin, clear membrane (conjunctiva) over the white part of the eye (sclera). It may be triggered by a virus, bacteria, or foreign body in the eye. Antibiotic eye drops alleviate bacterial conjunctivitis, and antihistamine allergy pills or eye drops help control allergic conjunctivitis symptoms.

Did you know?

Although the Roman numeral for the number 4 has always been taught to have been "IV," according to historians, the ancient Romans probably used "IIII" most of the time. This is partially backed up by the fact that early grandfather clocks displayed IIII for the number 4 instead of IV. Early clockmakers apparently thought that the IIII balanced out the VIII (used for the number 8) on the clock face and that it just looked better.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library