Author Question: In 2006, in a sharp rebuke to the Bush administration, the Supreme Court ruled that the Guantanamo ... (Read 139 times)

Jipu 123 · **on:** Jul 9, 2018

In 2006, in a sharp rebuke to the Bush administration, the Supreme Court ruled that the Guantanamo tribunals violated both military law and the Geneva Convention.

Indicate whether the statement is true or false

Question 2

Before a treaty can become legally binding, the treaty must be

A) submitted to the United Nations for approval.
B) ratified by the Supreme Court.
C) approved by three-fourths of the state governments.
D) approved by a two-thirds vote in the Senate.
E) approved by a majority vote in both houses of Congress.

xMRAZ · **Reply #1 on:** Jul 9, 2018

Answer to Question 1

True

Answer to Question 2

D

Jipu 123 · **Reply #2 on:** Jul 9, 2018

TY

xMRAZ · **Reply #3 on:** Jul 9, 2018

Happy to Help

Author Question: In 2006, in a sharp rebuke to the Bush administration, the Supreme Court ruled that the Guantanamo ... (Read 139 times)

Jipu 123

In 2006, in a sharp rebuke to the Bush administration, the Supreme Court ruled that the Guantanamo ...

Related Topics

Need homework help now?

xMRAZ

In 2006, in a sharp rebuke to the Bush administration, the Supreme Court ruled that the Guantanamo ...

Jipu 123

In 2006, in a sharp rebuke to the Bush administration, the Supreme Court ruled that the Guantanamo ...

xMRAZ

In 2006, in a sharp rebuke to the Bush administration, the Supreme Court ruled that the Guantanamo ...