Author Question: In ____________, the Supreme Court held that a Pennsylvania law designed to prevent subsidence ... (Read 13 times)

saliriagwu · **on:** Jul 9, 2018

In ____________, the Supreme Court held that a Pennsylvania law designed to prevent subsidence damage from coal mining did not on its face violate either the Takings Clause or the Contracts Clause.

a. Hawaii Housing Authority v. Midkiff (1984)
b. Pennsylvania Coal Company v. Mahon (1922)
c. First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. County of Los Angeles (1987)
d. Keystone Bituminous Coal Association v. DeBenedictis (1987)

Question 2

In most campaigns, image trumps ideology.

Indicate whether the statement is true or false