Author Question: Opponents of judicial restraint argue that its adherents in the U.S. Supreme Court sometimes allow ... (Read 100 times)

silviawilliams41 · **on:** Jul 9, 2018

Opponents of judicial restraint argue that its adherents in the U.S. Supreme Court sometimes allow

a. too little power for states
b. too much influence by conservative judges
c. injustices to fester for too long in society
d. too much leeway to make the law from the bench
e. cases to languish too long in the court system

Question 2

Today the Contracts Clause is ______ employed as a limitation on state power.

a. often
b. seldom
c. never
d. always

cclemon1 · **Reply #1 on:** Jul 9, 2018

Answer to Question 1

c

Answer to Question 2

B

silviawilliams41 · **Reply #2 on:** Jul 9, 2018

TY

cclemon1 · **Reply #3 on:** Jul 9, 2018

Happy to Help

Author Question: Opponents of judicial restraint argue that its adherents in the U.S. Supreme Court sometimes allow ... (Read 100 times)

silviawilliams41

Opponents of judicial restraint argue that its adherents in the U.S. Supreme Court sometimes allow ...

cclemon1

Opponents of judicial restraint argue that its adherents in the U.S. Supreme Court sometimes allow ...

Related Topics

Need homework help now?

silviawilliams41

Opponents of judicial restraint argue that its adherents in the U.S. Supreme Court sometimes allow ...

cclemon1

Opponents of judicial restraint argue that its adherents in the U.S. Supreme Court sometimes allow ...