Author Question: Living in a female head of household is the strongest predictor of poverty in the United States. ... (Read 54 times)

geoffrey

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 880
Living in a female head of household is the strongest predictor of poverty in the United States.
 
  Indicate whether the statement is true or false

Question 2

Shays's Rebellion in 1786 was significant in part because it caused a nudge away from the Articles of Confederation and helped to inspire the Constitutional Convention. Why were the Massachusetts residents revolting?
 
  a. To secure voting rights
  b. To secure free speech rights
  c. To prevent the state from seizing their farms
  d. To protest lengthy jail terms for minor infraction
  e. To secure freedom of religion rights



nothere

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 324
Answer to Question 1

T

Answer to Question 2

c



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question


 

Did you know?

Chronic marijuana use can damage the white blood cells and reduce the immune system's ability to respond to disease by as much as 40%. Without a strong immune system, the body is vulnerable to all kinds of degenerative and infectious diseases.

Did you know?

There used to be a metric calendar, as well as metric clocks. The metric calendar, or "French Republican Calendar" divided the year into 12 months, but each month was divided into three 10-day weeks. Each day had 10 decimal hours. Each hour had 100 decimal minutes. Due to lack of popularity, the metric clocks and calendars were ended in 1795, three years after they had been first marketed.

Did you know?

The calories found in one piece of cherry cheesecake could light a 60-watt light bulb for 1.5 hours.

Did you know?

Each year in the United States, there are approximately six million pregnancies. This means that at any one time, about 4% of women in the United States are pregnant.

Did you know?

Although the Roman numeral for the number 4 has always been taught to have been "IV," according to historians, the ancient Romans probably used "IIII" most of the time. This is partially backed up by the fact that early grandfather clocks displayed IIII for the number 4 instead of IV. Early clockmakers apparently thought that the IIII balanced out the VIII (used for the number 8) on the clock face and that it just looked better.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library