Author Question: In Roth v. United States, the U.S. Supreme Court held that material must be utterly without social ... (Read 101 times)

EY67

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 531
In Roth v. United States, the U.S. Supreme Court held that material must be utterly without social importance in order to be considered __________.
 
  a. illegal
  b. obscene
  c. hate speech
 d. fighting words

Question 2

When a case that an interest group is interested in comes before the Supreme Court, the group can __________.
 
  a. meet with judges to explain the group's policy preferences
  b. file an amicus curiae brief in support of one side of the case
  c. appeal the case to a higher court.
 d. legally offer monetary incentives to the justices as long as the interest group is not a party to the case



Animal_Goddess

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 339
Answer to Question 1

b

Answer to Question 2

b



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
 

Did you know?

Fungal nail infections account for up to 30% of all skin infections. They affect 5% of the general population—mostly people over the age of 70.

Did you know?

On average, the stomach produces 2 L of hydrochloric acid per day.

Did you know?

Thyroid conditions cause a higher risk of fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue syndrome.

Did you know?

People about to have surgery must tell their health care providers about all supplements they take.

Did you know?

The use of salicylates dates back 2,500 years to Hippocrates’s recommendation of willow bark (from which a salicylate is derived) as an aid to the pains of childbirth. However, overdosage of salicylates can harm body fluids, electrolytes, the CNS, the GI tract, the ears, the lungs, the blood, the liver, and the kidneys and cause coma or death.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library