Author Question: Briefly explain how the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling on Republican Party of Minnesota v. White ... (Read 57 times)

cartlidgeashley

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 572
Briefly explain how the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling on Republican Party of Minnesota v. White changed judicial elections.
 
  What will be an ideal response?

Question 2

The Hatcher Act consisted of a series of legislative acts, executive orders, and proclamations creating large-scale federal programs that sought to provide retirement insurance, health care, economic security, and poverty relief for Americans.
 
  Indicate whether the statement is true or false.



jaykayy05

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 329
Answer to Question 1

An ideal response would be:
In 2002, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Republican Party of Minnesota v. Whitethat announce clauses violated judicial candidates' rights under the First Amendment. As a result, judges have felt freer to take stances on controversial political issues like the death penalty, same-sex marriage, or funding for education. This, in turn, has increased turnout in judicial elections.

Answer to Question 2

FALSE



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
 

Did you know?

As of mid-2016, 18.2 million people were receiving advanced retroviral therapy (ART) worldwide. This represents between 43–50% of the 34–39.8 million people living with HIV.

Did you know?

Medication errors are more common among seriously ill patients than with those with minor conditions.

Did you know?

Urine turns bright yellow if larger than normal amounts of certain substances are consumed; one of these substances is asparagus.

Did you know?

It is difficult to obtain enough calcium without consuming milk or other dairy foods.

Did you know?

People with high total cholesterol have about two times the risk for heart disease as people with ideal levels.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library