This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: In your opinion, is representative democracy or direct democracy preferable? Based on your answers, ... (Read 105 times)

rl

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 579
In your opinion, is representative democracy or direct democracy preferable? Based on your answers, what changes would you make to the American political system?
 
  What will be an ideal response?

Question 2

If you were to debate critics of liberal democracy, how would you respond to their most common criticisms?
 
  What will be an ideal response?



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

at

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 359
Answer to Question 1

An ideal response will:
1, Distinguish between representative and direct democracies. In a representative democracy, the people select leaders who make policies, whereas in a direct democracy, the people meet to discuss issues of the day and to make policy.
2, Argue the advantages of the chosen democracy. For example, if arguing that representative democracy is preferable, the answer would note that direct democracy is not feasible in a largely populated country. Further, if citizens are not well-informed and participation rates are low, itwill undermine the popular sovereignty that direct democracy espouses to promote. If arguing in favor of direct democracy, the answer should discuss how this form of democracy increases popular sovereignty because it allows the people to discuss and decide on issues.
3, Describe how the American political system might benefit from encouraging direct democracy at the state or local level, but representative democracy is preferable nationally.

Answer to Question 2

An ideal response will:
1, Note that critics of liberal democracy argue that the majority can threaten liberty, that the people are irrational and incompetent, and that majoritarian democracy threatens minorities.
2, Indicate that despite these concerns, liberal democracies are better than alternatives.
3, Provide a response to each of the contentions of critics. For example, while critics note that the majority can threaten the liberty of the minority, the alternative is minority tyranny, which would mean that the minority tyrannizes the majority. Moreover, there is limited evidence that the majority consistently tyrannizes the minority. Alternatives to liberal democracies would not protect minorities to a greater extent.
4, Discuss how despite claims that the people are irrational and incompetent, there is evidence that the public is more informed, sophisticated, and stable than has been asserted.




rl

  • Member
  • Posts: 579
Reply 2 on: Jul 10, 2018
Excellent


isabelt_18

  • Member
  • Posts: 342
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Great answer, keep it coming :)

 

Did you know?

In 1886, William Bates reported on the discovery of a substance produced by the adrenal gland that turned out to be epinephrine (adrenaline). In 1904, this drug was first artificially synthesized by Friedrich Stolz.

Did you know?

Patients who cannot swallow may receive nutrition via a parenteral route—usually, a catheter is inserted through the chest into a large vein going into the heart.

Did you know?

Nearly 31 million adults in America have a total cholesterol level that is more than 240 mg per dL.

Did you know?

Drug-induced pharmacodynamic effects manifested in older adults include drug-induced renal toxicity, which can be a major factor when these adults are experiencing other kidney problems.

Did you know?

Bisphosphonates were first developed in the nineteenth century. They were first investigated for use in disorders of bone metabolism in the 1960s. They are now used clinically for the treatment of osteoporosis, Paget's disease, bone metastasis, multiple myeloma, and other conditions that feature bone fragility.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library