Answer to Question 1
An ideal response will:
1. Summarize the Court's decisions: in 2010, the Supreme Court reversed a long-standing ban on the use of corporate and union general funds for election communications. In 2014, the Supreme Court struck down aggregate limits on how much an individual can contribute to candidates, party committees, or PACs.
2. Evaluate the consequences of these decisions, noting the development of Super PACs since 2010 and the increased spending on campaigns.
3. Draw a conclusion regarding the merits of the Court's decisions. For instance, one might argue that protecting free speech is the most important consideration, regardless of the consequences of the decision. Alternatively, one might argue that these decisions will lead to an increase in unregulated electioneering by corporations and unions and will allow corporations, unions, and wealthy individuals to have disproportionate influence on election outcomes.
Answer to Question 2
An ideal response will:
1. Explain Madison's views about factions, which he defined as groups pursuing their self-interest at the expense of the broader public good.
2. Provide multiple of examples of modern-day groups that would be considered factions, such as specific interest groups, political action committees (PACs), or even political parties.
3. Explain what goals each faction pursues and evaluate whether the group's activities work against the public good.
Charles Darwin may be dead and gone but a recent write-in campaign has pitted him against Republican
Procedures for Diagnostic Tests Related to the Digestive System
A schematic of a Stanadyne diesel fuel injection pump assembly showing all of the related ...
Polio eradication campaign in Georgia in the 1950s. In the 1950s, 20,000 cases of polio occurred ...
The year 2010 was the hottest since 1880
Average real hourly wages (2010 dollars) by education level, full-time workers aged 17 to 34 in 2011