[Answered] The public/private dichotomy theory holds that female subordination is based on the universal role ...

This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: The public/private dichotomy theory holds that female subordination is based on the universal role ... (Read 62 times)

pane00

Hero Member
Posts: 579

on: Jul 10, 2018

The public/private dichotomy theory holds that female subordination is based on the universal role of women as mothers and homemakers.

Indicate whether the statement is true or false

Question 2

All anthropologists agree that male dominance is universal.

Indicate whether the statement is true or false

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question

Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

cadimas

Sr. Member
Posts: 362

Reply #1 on: Jul 10, 2018

Answer to Question 1

TRUE

Answer to Question 2

FALSE

pane00

Member
Posts: 579

Reply 2 on: Jul 10, 2018

Great answer, keep it coming

daiying98

Member
Posts: 354

Reply 3 on: Yesterday

Excellent

« previous next »

Did you know?

According to animal studies, the typical American diet is damaging to the liver and may result in allergies, low energy, digestive problems, and a lack of ability to detoxify harmful substances.

Did you know?

The average person is easily confused by the terms pharmaceutics and pharmacology, thinking they are one and the same. Whereas pharmaceutics is the science of preparing and dispensing drugs (otherwise known as the science of pharmacy), pharmacology is the study of medications.

Did you know?

According to the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, lung disease is the third leading killer in the United States, responsible for one in seven deaths. It is the leading cause of death among infants under the age of one year.

Did you know?

Alzheimer's disease affects only about 10% of people older than 65 years of age. Most forms of decreased mental function and dementia are caused by disuse (letting the mind get lazy).

Did you know?

Although the Roman numeral for the number 4 has always been taught to have been "IV," according to historians, the ancient Romans probably used "IIII" most of the time. This is partially backed up by the fact that early grandfather clocks displayed IIII for the number 4 instead of IV. Early clockmakers apparently thought that the IIII balanced out the VIII (used for the number 8) on the clock face and that it just looked better.