Author Question: Why do some linguists argue that the evidence for an innate grammar is weak? A) Children learn ... (Read 88 times)

Bernana

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 530
Why do some linguists argue that the evidence for an innate grammar is weak?
 
  A) Children learn features like word order at different times, depending on their importance in their native language.
  B) Children across cultures start creating short sentences at very different ages.
  C) Most children learn basic syntax early, but building their vocabulary takes many years.
  D) Across cultures, children understand individual words but do not understand grammar rules until formally taught them in school.

Question 2

To attract multinational corporations, the Malaysian government __________.
 
  a. pays union fees for workers
  b. builds facilities in which low-skilled, assembly-line tasks can be performed
  c. grants tax benefits and reduces tariffs for multinationals
  d. encourages population growth to ensure an adequate number of potential workers



cam1229

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 329
Answer to Question 1

A

Answer to Question 2

c



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
 

Did you know?

Cyanide works by making the human body unable to use oxygen.

Did you know?

The highest suicide rate in the United States is among people ages 65 years and older. Almost 15% of people in this age group commit suicide every year.

Did you know?

More than 50% of American adults have oral herpes, which is commonly known as "cold sores" or "fever blisters." The herpes virus can be active on the skin surface without showing any signs or causing any symptoms.

Did you know?

About 3.2 billion people, nearly half the world population, are at risk for malaria. In 2015, there are about 214 million malaria cases and an estimated 438,000 malaria deaths.

Did you know?

Although the Roman numeral for the number 4 has always been taught to have been "IV," according to historians, the ancient Romans probably used "IIII" most of the time. This is partially backed up by the fact that early grandfather clocks displayed IIII for the number 4 instead of IV. Early clockmakers apparently thought that the IIII balanced out the VIII (used for the number 8) on the clock face and that it just looked better.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library