This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: Why is there so little experimental research in political science? That is, why is it so difficult ... (Read 59 times)

WWatsford

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 539
    • Biology Forums!
Why is there so little experimental research in political science? That is, why is it so difficult to conduct experiments?
 
  What will be an ideal response?

Question 2

Why is it important to know the different levels of measurement? That is, what difference does the level of measurement of the data make?
 
  What will be an ideal response?



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

pikon

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 361
Answer to Question 1

Answer: Because the types of independent variables we use cannot be controlled, they cannot be experimentally manipulated.

Answer to Question 2

Answer: Different levels of measurement require different statistical techniques for data analysis.




WWatsford

  • Member
  • Posts: 539
Reply 2 on: Jul 12, 2018
YES! Correct, THANKS for helping me on my review


hollysheppard095

  • Member
  • Posts: 339
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Gracias!

 

Did you know?

It is important to read food labels and choose foods with low cholesterol and saturated trans fat. You should limit saturated fat to no higher than 6% of daily calories.

Did you know?

Vampire bats have a natural anticoagulant in their saliva that permits continuous bleeding after they painlessly open a wound with their incisors. This capillary blood does not cause any significant blood loss to their victims.

Did you know?

Of the estimated 2 million heroin users in the United States, 600,000–800,000 are considered hardcore addicts. Heroin addiction is considered to be one of the hardest addictions to recover from.

Did you know?

Dogs have been used in studies to detect various cancers in human subjects. They have been trained to sniff breath samples from humans that were collected by having them breathe into special tubes. These people included 55 lung cancer patients, 31 breast cancer patients, and 83 cancer-free patients. The dogs detected 54 of the 55 lung cancer patients as having cancer, detected 28 of the 31 breast cancer patients, and gave only three false-positive results (detecting cancer in people who didn't have it).

Did you know?

The average office desk has 400 times more bacteria on it than a toilet.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library