Answer to Question 1
The Nuremburg Code stipulates that research must contribute to existing knowledge (Point 2); further, no research should be conducted if it will not produce results that are useful within a discipline (Point 3). If experimenters notice that a participant is at risk, they must terminate the research immediately (Point 10). Given that research has merit, any risks associated with it must be less than the potential gain from doing the study (Point 6).
Answer to Question 2
In their study, they identified two IVs: whether a person was high or low in prejudice and whether they thought people held the same attitudes that they did. The interaction effects were important here because they showed that people altered the distance they sat from a black confederate of the experimenter depending on whether they thought other people on their campus had similar views.
People high in prejudice sat closer to the confederate when they thought others on campus thought differently about race than they did compared to the case when they thought others were in agreement with them. People low in prejudice reversed this pattern, sitting farther from the black confederate when they thought people were generally in agreement with them. On whole, though, those low in prejudice sat closer than people higher in prejudice.
Degree of genetic relatedness to self in a diploid organism.
Mitosis + Check Points 3 of 5
Characteristics of a Neuron at Rest and During the Different Phases of an Action Potential
What degree of certainty?
Algorithm for assessing a patient at risk for suicide.
Differences in the mitochondrial code and coding for the “21st and 22nd” amino acids