This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: In the Sommers and Ellsworth (2001) experiment on the effects of race on a trial verdict, explain ... (Read 31 times)

jho37

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 531
In the Sommers and Ellsworth (2001) experiment on the effects of race on a trial verdict, explain how the interaction provided important information. Were the independent variables qualitative or quantitative? the dependent variables?
 
  What will be an ideal response?

Question 2

What points to researchers need to consider if they intend to use deception in their research?
 
  What will be an ideal response?



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

AngeliqueG

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 343
Answer to Question 1

In the Sommers and Ellison experiment, there was no difference in sentencing for black defendants when a mock trial involved a specific statement about racial issues. On the other hand, when race was not mentioned, black defendants received longer sentences than white defendants. If there had been only one variable, the investigators would not have seen the complex pattern of results.
That is, if the researchers had only compared sentences of black and white defendants in race-salient trials, they would have concluded that race was unimportant on sentence length. If the researchers had only compared sentences of black and white defendants in non-race-salient trials, they would have concluded that race did make a difference. The truth is more complex: race sometimes makes a difference, but sometimes it doesn't. You need a factorial design to see this complexity.

Answer to Question 2

Deception is tolerable only if there is no feasible alternative and if it will not expose the participant to physical or psychological harm, including embarrassment or other discomfort. If deception is necessary, the researcher must debrief and dehoax the participant. In the end, the researcher must make sure that the participant is not negatively affected at the conclusion of the research setting. If there is any doubt, compensatory followup is required.




jho37

  • Member
  • Posts: 531
Reply 2 on: Jul 13, 2018
Great answer, keep it coming :)


LegendaryAnswers

  • Member
  • Posts: 341
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Gracias!

 

Did you know?

Carbamazepine can interfere with the results of home pregnancy tests. If you are taking carbamazepine, do not try to test for pregnancy at home.

Did you know?

Medication errors are three times higher among children and infants than with adults.

Did you know?

All adverse reactions are commonly charted in red ink in the patient's record and usually are noted on the front of the chart. Failure to follow correct documentation procedures may result in malpractice lawsuits.

Did you know?

The immune system needs 9.5 hours of sleep in total darkness to recharge completely.

Did you know?

In 1885, the Lloyd Manufacturing Company of Albany, New York, promoted and sold "Cocaine Toothache Drops" at 15 cents per bottle! In 1914, the Harrison Narcotic Act brought the sale and distribution of this drug under federal control.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library