Author Question: Despite their huge populations, China and India represent a much smaller opportunity in terms of ... (Read 58 times)

bobthebuilder

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 567
Despite their huge populations, China and India represent a much smaller opportunity in terms of size and economic growth.
 
 Indicate whether the statement is true or false

Question 2

Howard believes that there should be no trade restrictions for any reason. What effect would Howard say that trade restrictions have on prices?
 A) He would argue that by encouraging competition with trade restrictions, prices are likely to decrease.
  B) He would argue that restrictions would cause greater competition and therefore lead to higher prices.
  C) He would say that trade restrictions have no impact on prices, but they do restrict consumers' choices.
  D) He would say that restrictions reduce competition and therefore cause an increase in prices.
  E) He would argue that trade restrictions increase prices because they break up domestic monopolies.



lou

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 286
Answer to Question 1

False

Answer to Question 2

D



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
 

Did you know?

In 1886, William Bates reported on the discovery of a substance produced by the adrenal gland that turned out to be epinephrine (adrenaline). In 1904, this drug was first artificially synthesized by Friedrich Stolz.

Did you know?

There are 60,000 miles of blood vessels in every adult human.

Did you know?

About 80% of major fungal systemic infections are due to Candida albicans. Another form, Candida peritonitis, occurs most often in postoperative patients. A rare disease, Candida meningitis, may follow leukemia, kidney transplant, other immunosuppressed factors, or when suffering from Candida septicemia.

Did you know?

Pubic lice (crabs) are usually spread through sexual contact. You cannot catch them by using a public toilet.

Did you know?

Although the Roman numeral for the number 4 has always been taught to have been "IV," according to historians, the ancient Romans probably used "IIII" most of the time. This is partially backed up by the fact that early grandfather clocks displayed IIII for the number 4 instead of IV. Early clockmakers apparently thought that the IIII balanced out the VIII (used for the number 8) on the clock face and that it just looked better.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library