This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: If we were to classify books, which category or subunit does not apply to our method of division? ... (Read 86 times)

Collmarie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 569
If we were to classify books, which category or subunit does not apply to our method
  of division?
 
  a. hardback books
  b. paperback books
  c. pop-up books
  d. science books

Question 2

It is critical to classify a subject into smaller units of the same type.
 
  a. True
  b. False



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

Alyson.hiatt@yahoo.com

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 354
Answer to Question 1

d

Answer to Question 2

a




Collmarie

  • Member
  • Posts: 569
Reply 2 on: Jul 15, 2018
Thanks for the timely response, appreciate it


ryansturges

  • Member
  • Posts: 338
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Excellent

 

Did you know?

It is important to read food labels and choose foods with low cholesterol and saturated trans fat. You should limit saturated fat to no higher than 6% of daily calories.

Did you know?

Thyroid conditions may make getting pregnant impossible.

Did you know?

Amphetamine poisoning can cause intravascular coagulation, circulatory collapse, rhabdomyolysis, ischemic colitis, acute psychosis, hyperthermia, respiratory distress syndrome, and pericarditis.

Did you know?

Asthma-like symptoms were first recorded about 3,500 years ago in Egypt. The first manuscript specifically written about asthma was in the year 1190, describing a condition characterized by sudden breathlessness. The treatments listed in this manuscript include chicken soup, herbs, and sexual abstinence.

Did you know?

Dogs have been used in studies to detect various cancers in human subjects. They have been trained to sniff breath samples from humans that were collected by having them breathe into special tubes. These people included 55 lung cancer patients, 31 breast cancer patients, and 83 cancer-free patients. The dogs detected 54 of the 55 lung cancer patients as having cancer, detected 28 of the 31 breast cancer patients, and gave only three false-positive results (detecting cancer in people who didn't have it).

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library