Consider the ultimate impact that environmental law has on the ...

[TFauchery]

Consider the ultimate impact that environmental law has on the economy. Do short-term drawbacks justify long-term goals? If there is a conflict, which should come firstthe economy or the environment?
 
  What will be an ideal response?

Question 2

What new technology has revolutionized the natural gas scene in the United States?
 
  What will be an ideal response?

[Perkypinki]

Answer to Question 1

Anecdotal evidence may suggest that environmental laws are detrimental to the economy, but studies show the opposite. Economic performance is highest where environmental public policy is most highly developed. If workers are healthier, the physical plant energy is efficient, and resources are conserved, then the company will see a larger profit and be more competitive. Therefore, the wealth is transferred from polluting companies to those that are less polluting. The environment protection industry itself is good for the economy as it employs people for a variety of jobs.
Developing countries such as China have followed the U.S. precedent that the economy should come first, but are paying for it now with bad air, polluted water, and unhealthy conditions. Given the problems these countries are having, it seems clear that the environment should come first.

Answer to Question 2

Using new techniques adapted from oil extraction, an abundant source of natural gas trapped in shale has dramatically changed the natural gas picture in the past few years.