Author Question: What are some of the problems with an isostatic model of crustal elevations that relies on wood ... (Read 41 times)

mikaylakyoung

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 531
What are some of the problems with an isostatic model of crustal elevations that relies on wood blocks floating in water as an analogy?
 
  What will be an ideal response?

Question 2

Explain two lines of evidence for how we know that mountains have roots.
 
  What will be an ideal response?



juicepod

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 310
Answer to Question 1

The wood-block analogy requires a very weak crust that breaks at the edges of blocks and the breaks go all the way to the base of the blocks. The upper crust is strong (not weak) and faults do not penetrate all the way to the base of the crust. The water analogy assumes a much lower viscosity than Earth's mantle.

Answer to Question 2

During the survey of northern India, a plumb weight did not point directly towards Earth's center but was deflected towards the Himalayas. The amount of deflection is consistent with the Himalayas having a thick crustal root. Seismic data also show that the crust beneath the Himalayas is thicker than the adjacent area to the south.



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
 

Did you know?

Many supplement containers do not even contain what their labels say. There are many documented reports of products containing much less, or more, that what is listed on their labels. They may also contain undisclosed prescription drugs and even contaminants.

Did you know?

There are 20 feet of blood vessels in each square inch of human skin.

Did you know?

The first war in which wide-scale use of anesthetics occurred was the Civil War, and 80% of all wounds were in the extremities.

Did you know?

The heart is located in the center of the chest, with part of it tipped slightly so that it taps against the left side of the chest.

Did you know?

The first monoclonal antibodies were made exclusively from mouse cells. Some are now fully human, which means they are likely to be safer and may be more effective than older monoclonal antibodies.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library