Answer to Question 1
C
The optimum outcome in this situation would be to minimize the duration of the restraint episode; the patient and others are at risk of injury until she is able to calm, and the restraints will likely worsen and extend the inmate's distress and agitation. Supporting the use of restraints ignores the need of select inmates to be managed with alternate responses that do not paradoxically worsen the situation instead of help it. Meeting with the patient to calm her after her release would be the second most helpful response because it does not shorten the duration of the patient's restraint. Confronting the officers is unlikely to be successful, since they are following proper procedures; accusing them of improper actions will likely increase defensiveness rather than expedite the inmate's release from restraint.
Answer to Question 2
A
Waiting without information about what is occurring, especially for one already worried about an ill spouse, is very anxiety provoking. Some persons would interpret this waiting as neglect, a sign that staff do not care, leading to increasing frustration and anger. Providing periodic updates on the patient's condition and what is being done to help her keeps the spouse involved and reduces misperceptions. The other options fail to address specifically the dynamic underlying the spouse's escalating frustration, because they do not fill in the unknowns with specific information. Asking him to wait 3 hours at home would only compound his anxiety. Suggesting that he relax could be perceived as implying that his response is unreasonable, which would likely be perceived as criticism, frustrating him further and likely increasing his anger.