Author Question: A repeated-measures test usually is more likely to detect a real treatment effect than an ... (Read 56 times)

pane00

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 579
A repeated-measures test usually is more likely to detect a real treatment effect than an independent-measures test because the repeated-measures design typically has a smaller variance and a smaller estimated standard error.
 
  Indicate whether the statement is true or false

Question 2

A sample has a mean of M = 40. If a new score of X = 55 is added to the sample, then the sample mean would increase.
 
  Indicate whether the statement is true or false



Jsherida

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 314
Answer to Question 1

True

Answer to Question 2

True



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
 

Did you know?

Most fungi that pathogenically affect humans live in soil. If a person is not healthy, has an open wound, or is immunocompromised, a fungal infection can be very aggressive.

Did you know?

There are more bacteria in your mouth than there are people in the world.

Did you know?

About 600,000 particles of skin are shed every hour by each human. If you live to age 70 years, you have shed 105 pounds of dead skin.

Did you know?

Drying your hands with a paper towel will reduce the bacterial count on your hands by 45–60%.

Did you know?

Hippocrates noted that blood separates into four differently colored liquids when removed from the body and examined: a pure red liquid mixed with white liquid material with a yellow-colored froth at the top and a black substance that settles underneath; he named these the four humors (for blood, phlegm, yellow bile, and black bile).

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library