Which of the following countries did NOT see great benefits as a result of the Green Revolution? ...

Author Question: Which of the following countries did NOT see great benefits as a result of the Green Revolution? ... (Read 55 times)

mwit1967

Hero Member
Posts: 501

on: Jul 21, 2018

Which of the following countries did NOT see great benefits as a result of the Green Revolution?

a. Mexico c. Pakistan
b. India d. Sudan

Question 2

If only organic farming is used in the future, there will not be enough organic material to fertilize all the crops planted.

Indicate whether the statement is true or false

debra928

Sr. Member
Posts: 342

Reply #1 on: Jul 21, 2018

Answer to Question 1

D

Answer to Question 2

T

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question

« previous next »

Did you know?

Hippocrates noted that blood separates into four differently colored liquids when removed from the body and examined: a pure red liquid mixed with white liquid material with a yellow-colored froth at the top and a black substance that settles underneath; he named these the four humors (for blood, phlegm, yellow bile, and black bile).

Did you know?

Astigmatism is the most common vision problem. It may accompany nearsightedness or farsightedness. It is usually caused by an irregularly shaped cornea, but sometimes it is the result of an irregularly shaped lens. Either type can be corrected by eyeglasses, contact lenses, or refractive surgery.

Did you know?

Acute bronchitis is an inflammation of the breathing tubes (bronchi), which causes increased mucus production and other changes. It is usually caused by bacteria or viruses, can be serious in people who have pulmonary or cardiac diseases, and can lead to pneumonia.

Did you know?

Alzheimer's disease affects only about 10% of people older than 65 years of age. Most forms of decreased mental function and dementia are caused by disuse (letting the mind get lazy).

Did you know?

The first monoclonal antibodies were made exclusively from mouse cells. Some are now fully human, which means they are likely to be safer and may be more effective than older monoclonal antibodies.