[Answered] The only way to resolve some ambiguous sentences is to take into account their deep structure. ...

This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: The only way to resolve some ambiguous sentences is to take into account their deep structure. ... (Read 45 times)

jhjkgdfhk

Hero Member
Posts: 569

on: Jun 20, 2018

The only way to resolve some ambiguous sentences is to take into account their deep structure.

Indicate whether the statement is true or false

Question 2

Grammatical rules partition sentences into noun and verb phrases.

Indicate whether the statement is true or false

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question

Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

Bigfoot1984

Sr. Member
Posts: 321

Reply #1 on: Jun 20, 2018

Answer to Question 1

T

Answer to Question 2

T

jhjkgdfhk

Member
Posts: 569

Reply 2 on: Jun 20, 2018

Great answer, keep it coming

shailee

Member
Posts: 392

Reply 3 on: Yesterday

Thanks for the timely response, appreciate it

« previous next »

Did you know?

The first-known contraceptive was crocodile dung, used in Egypt in 2000 BC. Condoms were also reportedly used, made of animal bladders or intestines.

Did you know?

The cure for trichomoniasis is easy as long as the patient does not drink alcoholic beverages for 24 hours. Just a single dose of medication is needed to rid the body of the disease. However, without proper precautions, an individual may contract the disease repeatedly. In fact, most people develop trichomoniasis again within three months of their last treatment.

Did you know?

The Babylonians wrote numbers in a system that used 60 as the base value rather than the number 10. They did not have a symbol for "zero."

Did you know?

The average office desk has 400 times more bacteria on it than a toilet.

Did you know?

When Gabriel Fahrenheit invented the first mercury thermometer, he called "zero degrees" the lowest temperature he was able to attain with a mixture of ice and salt. For the upper point of his scale, he used 96°, which he measured as normal human body temperature (we know it to be 98.6° today because of more accurate thermometers).