This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: The difference between a test comparing two means and a test comparing the frequency of two outcomes ... (Read 133 times)

ss2343

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 548
The difference between a test comparing two means and a test comparing the frequency of two outcomes is
 
  a. the test statistics that they employ and their calculation.
  b. the logic behind the two different hypothesis testing procedures.
  c. the way we go about drawing conclusions from the tests.
  d. all of the above

Question 2

We are most likely to reject a null hypothesis if the test statistic we compute is
 
  a. very small.
  b. quite extreme.
  c. what we would expect if the null hypothesis were true.
  d. equal to the number of observations in the sample.



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

mistyjohnson

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 331
Answer to Question 1

A

Answer to Question 2

B




ss2343

  • Member
  • Posts: 548
Reply 2 on: Jun 20, 2018
Gracias!


T4T

  • Member
  • Posts: 348
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Wow, this really help

 

Did you know?

For high blood pressure (hypertension), a new class of drug, called a vasopeptidase blocker (inhibitor), has been developed. It decreases blood pressure by simultaneously dilating the peripheral arteries and increasing the body's loss of salt.

Did you know?

Malaria mortality rates are falling. Increased malaria prevention and control measures have greatly improved these rates. Since 2000, malaria mortality rates have fallen globally by 60% among all age groups, and by 65% among children under age 5.

Did you know?

On average, someone in the United States has a stroke about every 40 seconds. This is about 795,000 people per year.

Did you know?

Women are two-thirds more likely than men to develop irritable bowel syndrome. This may be attributable to hormonal changes related to their menstrual cycles.

Did you know?

Dogs have been used in studies to detect various cancers in human subjects. They have been trained to sniff breath samples from humans that were collected by having them breathe into special tubes. These people included 55 lung cancer patients, 31 breast cancer patients, and 83 cancer-free patients. The dogs detected 54 of the 55 lung cancer patients as having cancer, detected 28 of the 31 breast cancer patients, and gave only three false-positive results (detecting cancer in people who didn't have it).

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library