[Answered] If other factors are held constant, then increasing the sample size will increase the likelihood of ...

This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: If other factors are held constant, then increasing the sample size will increase the likelihood of ... (Read 97 times)

james

Hero Member
Posts: 573

on: Jun 20, 2018

If other factors are held constant, then increasing the sample size will increase the likelihood of rejecting the null hypothesis.

Indicate whether the statement is true or false

Question 2

In a research report, the term significant result means that the null hypothesis was rejected.

Indicate whether the statement is true or false

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question

Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

cascooper22

Sr. Member
Posts: 312

Reply #1 on: Jun 20, 2018

Answer to Question 1

T

Answer to Question 2

T

james

Member
Posts: 573

Reply 2 on: Jun 20, 2018

Excellent

tranoy

Member
Posts: 344

Reply 3 on: Yesterday

Thanks for the timely response, appreciate it

« previous next »

Did you know?

Approximately 70% of expectant mothers report experiencing some symptoms of morning sickness during the first trimester of pregnancy.

Did you know?

The largest baby ever born weighed more than 23 pounds but died just 11 hours after his birth in 1879. The largest surviving baby was born in October 2009 in Sumatra, Indonesia, and weighed an astounding 19.2 pounds at birth.

Did you know?

Many people have small pouches in their colons that bulge outward through weak spots. Each pouch is called a diverticulum. About 10% of Americans older than age 40 years have diverticulosis, which, when the pouches become infected or inflamed, is called diverticulitis. The main cause of diverticular disease is a low-fiber diet.

Did you know?

Human kidneys will clean about 1 million gallons of blood in an average lifetime.

Did you know?

Dogs have been used in studies to detect various cancers in human subjects. They have been trained to sniff breath samples from humans that were collected by having them breathe into special tubes. These people included 55 lung cancer patients, 31 breast cancer patients, and 83 cancer-free patients. The dogs detected 54 of the 55 lung cancer patients as having cancer, detected 28 of the 31 breast cancer patients, and gave only three false-positive results (detecting cancer in people who didn't have it).