This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: The difference between the standard emergency triage practice and the current emergency triage of ... (Read 92 times)

neverstopbelieb

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 534
The difference between the standard emergency triage practice and the current emergency triage of mass casualties is that:
 
  1. current emergencies triage women and children first.
  2. standard triage treats those with least serious injuries first.
  3. previous emergencies never involved the triage of mass casualties or victims of infectious agents.
  4. emergency triage focuses on the clients with the best chance to live.

Question 2

During a medication history, a client reports taking acetazolamide (Diamox) for glaucoma. The nurse should assess this client for:
 
  Standard Text: Select all that apply.
  1. changes in energy level.
  2. nausea and vomiting.
  3. known allergies to any medications.
  4. recent blood work done for electrolytes.
  5. eye burning or excessive tearing.



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

katieost

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 358
Answer to Question 1

Correct Answer: 4
Rationale 1: Current emergencies do not triage women and children first.
Rationale 2: Standard triage treats those with the worst injuries first.
Rationale 3: In the past, most training for triage focused on emergency management for natural disasters, catastrophic accidents, or infectious epidemics.
Rationale 4: Emergency triage may be reversed, focusing on clients with the best chance to live.
Global Rationale: Emergency triage may be reversed, focusing on clients with the best chance to live. Women and children are not triaged as first to be treated in either type of triage. Standard triage treats those with the most serious injuries first. In the past, most training for triage focused on emergency management for natural disasters, catastrophic accidents, or infectious epidemics.

Answer to Question 2

Correct Answer: 1,2,3,4
Rationale 1: This medication can cause lethargy and drowsiness.
Rationale 2: This medication can cause nausea and vomiting.
Rationale 3: This medication contains sulfur and may cause an allergic reaction.
Rationale 4: This medication is a diuretic and can cause electrolyte imbalances.
Rationale 5: This medication does not cause eye burning or excessive tearing.
Global Rationale: This medication can cause lethargy, drowsiness, nausea, and vomiting. It contains sulfur and may cause an allergic reaction. The diuretic effect of the medication can cause electrolyte imbalances. This medication does not cause eye burning or excessive tearing.




neverstopbelieb

  • Member
  • Posts: 534
Reply 2 on: Jul 23, 2018
Wow, this really help


bimper21

  • Member
  • Posts: 309
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
:D TYSM

 

Did you know?

It is believed that the Incas used anesthesia. Evidence supports the theory that shamans chewed cocoa leaves and drilled holes into the heads of patients (letting evil spirits escape), spitting into the wounds they made. The mixture of cocaine, saliva, and resin numbed the site enough to allow hours of drilling.

Did you know?

Asthma cases in Americans are about 75% higher today than they were in 1980.

Did you know?

Oliver Wendell Holmes is credited with introducing the words "anesthesia" and "anesthetic" into the English language in 1846.

Did you know?

Vampire bats have a natural anticoagulant in their saliva that permits continuous bleeding after they painlessly open a wound with their incisors. This capillary blood does not cause any significant blood loss to their victims.

Did you know?

The first war in which wide-scale use of anesthetics occurred was the Civil War, and 80% of all wounds were in the extremities.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library