This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: Which of the following conclusions do you draw if the p-value is smaller than the level of ... (Read 199 times)

CBme

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 548
Which of the following conclusions do you draw if the p-value is smaller than the level of significance?
 a. Reject the null hypothesis.
  b. Accept the alternative hypothesis.
  c. The true population value is significantly different from the value in the null hypothesis.
  d. All of the above.

Question 2

What should you conclude if your p-value is greater than the level of significance?
 a. Do not reject the null hypothesis.
  b. Accept the null hypothesis.
  c. Conclude that chance alone produced the observed results.
  d. Accept the alternative hypothesis.



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

olderstudent

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 339
Answer to Question 1

D

Answer to Question 2

A




olderstudent

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 339

 

Did you know?

A cataract is a clouding of the eyes' natural lens. As we age, some clouding of the lens may occur. The first sign of a cataract is usually blurry vision. Although glasses and other visual aids may at first help a person with cataracts, surgery may become inevitable. Cataract surgery is very successful in restoring vision, and it is the most frequently performed surgery in the United States.

Did you know?

In the United States, there is a birth every 8 seconds, according to the U.S. Census Bureau's Population Clock.

Did you know?

Russia has the highest death rate from cardiovascular disease followed by the Ukraine, Romania, Hungary, and Poland.

Did you know?

It is believed that humans initially contracted crabs from gorillas about 3 million years ago from either sleeping in gorilla nests or eating the apes.

Did you know?

Dogs have been used in studies to detect various cancers in human subjects. They have been trained to sniff breath samples from humans that were collected by having them breathe into special tubes. These people included 55 lung cancer patients, 31 breast cancer patients, and 83 cancer-free patients. The dogs detected 54 of the 55 lung cancer patients as having cancer, detected 28 of the 31 breast cancer patients, and gave only three false-positive results (detecting cancer in people who didn't have it).

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library