This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: Why were two of the children excluded from all of the statistical analyses? A) because they did ... (Read 35 times)

mydiamond

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 804
Why were two of the children excluded from all of the statistical analyses?
 
  A) because they did not actually have congenital adrenal hyperplasia
  B) because they played with the toys beyond the amount of time allotted
  C) because they did not play with any toys during their sessions
  D) because they were violent with nearby children and would not share the toys

Question 2

A self-report measure where participants are asked to put an X along a segmented rating scale following a questionnaire item is known as a(n) __________ scale.
 
  a. semantic differential
  b. personal interview
  c. psychophysical
  d. event-related potential



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

morrie123456

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 314
Answer to Question 1

C

Answer to Question 2

a




mydiamond

  • Member
  • Posts: 804
Reply 2 on: Jun 20, 2018
Gracias!


mcarey591

  • Member
  • Posts: 365
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Thanks for the timely response, appreciate it

 

Did you know?

Interferon was scarce and expensive until 1980, when the interferon gene was inserted into bacteria using recombinant DNA technology, allowing for mass cultivation and purification from bacterial cultures.

Did you know?

After a vasectomy, it takes about 12 ejaculations to clear out sperm that were already beyond the blocked area.

Did you know?

Bisphosphonates were first developed in the nineteenth century. They were first investigated for use in disorders of bone metabolism in the 1960s. They are now used clinically for the treatment of osteoporosis, Paget's disease, bone metastasis, multiple myeloma, and other conditions that feature bone fragility.

Did you know?

Although the Roman numeral for the number 4 has always been taught to have been "IV," according to historians, the ancient Romans probably used "IIII" most of the time. This is partially backed up by the fact that early grandfather clocks displayed IIII for the number 4 instead of IV. Early clockmakers apparently thought that the IIII balanced out the VIII (used for the number 8) on the clock face and that it just looked better.

Did you know?

The Babylonians wrote numbers in a system that used 60 as the base value rather than the number 10. They did not have a symbol for "zero."

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library