Author Question: If we divide the total sum of squares by (n - 1), we get a. SSwg b. MSbg c. SStotal d. MStotal ... (Read 161 times)

kwoodring

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 560
If we divide the total sum of squares by (n - 1), we get
 
  a. SSwg
  b. MSbg
  c. SStotal
  d. MStotal
  e. MSwg

Question 2

a. the variance
  b. the mean difference  
  c. the sample size
  d. the alpha-level
  e. the null hypothesis
 
  a. the variance
  b. the mean difference
  c. the sample size
  d. the alpha-level
  e. the null hypothesis



mfedorka

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 324
Answer to Question 1

d

Answer to Question 2

c



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
 

Did you know?

Children with strabismus (crossed eyes) can be treated. They are not able to outgrow this condition on their own, but with help, it can be more easily corrected at a younger age. It is important for infants to have eye examinations as early as possible in their development and then another at age 2 years.

Did you know?

Human stomach acid is strong enough to dissolve small pieces of metal such as razor blades or staples.

Did you know?

In inpatient settings, adverse drug events account for an estimated one in three of all hospital adverse events. They affect approximately 2 million hospital stays every year, and prolong hospital stays by between one and five days.

Did you know?

A recent study has found that following a diet rich in berries may slow down the aging process of the brain. This diet apparently helps to keep dopamine levels much higher than are seen in normal individuals who do not eat berries as a regular part of their diet as they enter their later years.

Did you know?

Although the Roman numeral for the number 4 has always been taught to have been "IV," according to historians, the ancient Romans probably used "IIII" most of the time. This is partially backed up by the fact that early grandfather clocks displayed IIII for the number 4 instead of IV. Early clockmakers apparently thought that the IIII balanced out the VIII (used for the number 8) on the clock face and that it just looked better.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library