This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: What is the difference between a traditional liquid charged TEV bulb and a liquid cross-charged TEV ... (Read 107 times)

Pea0909berry

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 573
What is the difference between a traditional liquid charged TEV bulb and a liquid cross-charged TEV bulb?
 
  What will be an ideal response?

Question 2

What senses the superheat in electronic expansion valves?
 
  What will be an ideal response?



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

mbcrismon

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 328
Answer to Question 1

A traditional charge uses the same refrigerant as is in the system. A cross-charged bulb contains a different refrigerant than the system, so the pressure response of the bulb crosses the pressure response of the system at some point.

Answer to Question 2

Thermistors





 

Did you know?

The most dangerous mercury compound, dimethyl mercury, is so toxic that even a few microliters spilled on the skin can cause death. Mercury has been shown to accumulate in higher amounts in the following types of fish than other types: swordfish, shark, mackerel, tilefish, crab, and tuna.

Did you know?

Stroke kills people from all ethnic backgrounds, but the people at highest risk for fatal strokes are: black men, black women, Asian men, white men, and white women.

Did you know?

Intradermal injections are somewhat difficult to correctly administer because the skin layers are so thin that it is easy to accidentally punch through to the deeper subcutaneous layer.

Did you know?

Cutaneous mucormycosis is a rare fungal infection that has been fatal in at least 29% of cases, and in as many as 83% of cases, depending on the patient's health prior to infection. It has occurred often after natural disasters such as tornados, and early treatment is essential.

Did you know?

Dogs have been used in studies to detect various cancers in human subjects. They have been trained to sniff breath samples from humans that were collected by having them breathe into special tubes. These people included 55 lung cancer patients, 31 breast cancer patients, and 83 cancer-free patients. The dogs detected 54 of the 55 lung cancer patients as having cancer, detected 28 of the 31 breast cancer patients, and gave only three false-positive results (detecting cancer in people who didn't have it).

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library