A comparison of pseudoscience and science shows that a. both ...

[plus1]

A comparison of pseudoscience and science shows that
 
  a. both are willing to accept ideas as true even if there are no data to support the ideas yet.
  b. anecdotal evidence is a strong component of science, but not of pseudoscience.
  c. pseudoscience is based on dogma and uncritical belief, whereas science relies more on explanation by scenario.
  d. the scientific approach relies on testable ideas and facts that may change over time whereas the pseudoscientific approach involves active pursuit of unexplained phenomena.

Question 2

Individuals who make minor contributions to a published research project should be acknowledged by
 
  a. listing their names at the end of the list of authors' names.
  b. receiving appropriate gifts.
  c. listing their names at the start of the list of authors' names.
  d. including their names in a footnote or introductory statement.

[harveenkau8139]

Answer to Question 1

D

Answer to Question 2

d

[plus1]

Excellent

[robbielu01]

Gracias!